Yeller-dog Democrat, Management Consultant in Venture Capital and HR, ofttimes campaign manager/strategist (though I have no dog in the hunt as of 1/3/08), Nutmegger by birth and Texan by choice.
After Iowa, What's Next? (Besides NH.)
1. The money will tilt heavily to Obama and McCain. To Obama, because Independent voters have now proven something we always feared with an 'inevitable' HRC nomination--that they will not support HRC in the general election enough for her to become President even though the right Dem should be able to bank them 7-to-3 in November--and because Obama is the kind of likable, big-vision, and low-threat change-agent the GOP really can't beat now. (It would be very surprising if Obama doesn't tie HRC in national polls and best her in NH polls by tomorrow.) To McCain because while economic populism on the Left (Edwards) is expected by Big Money, Big Money despises and squashes it when it comes from the Right. Listening to McCain and Huckabee, one might guess that they've already talked about running together, which makes one of the biggest losers last night CT Senator Joe Lieberman. Before the Huckabee phenom, I'd have bet a case of Bud that McCain was going to tap Joe Lieberman as his VP. Not anymore, since no GOP presidential candidate can win without a full-court press by the fundamentalist Right, and this group now has a dog in the hunt. Assuming that Romney and Giuliani and Thompson don't surprise us and pull a McCain rebirth, unless Huckabee truly proves he has legs, my guess is that McCain will tap him for VP. (CT really has to pass some kind of recall mechanism and pass it quickly to remove the scourge of Lieberman from US politics.)
2. Obama needs Edwards to stay in the race through Super Tuesday. Edwards' strident populism, coupled with HRC's Iowa-proven mortality, will flood Obama's coffers with Dem and Independent money, and will also prompt pragmatic business donors to donate in buckets. Obama also needs Huckabee to lead McCain to get the lion's share of business donors. A populist leading on the GOP side will make businessmen and women write this cycle's checks to national candidates with their left hands.
3. Down-ticket concerns over HRC being at the top are now lessened, but will surface over Obama's being at the top of the Dem ticket. My guess is that the Clintonistas will foster this quickly, but that HRC will not become stridently critical of Obama herself. That would only confirm the negative image many Republicans, Independents, and Dems have of her as a national candidate. This makes the race in SC almost as important as the primary in NH. I expect Edwards to jump on this (down-ticket worries with Obama at the top of the ticket) as an eleventh-hour strategem. If Edwards doesn't win SC he will be out. I'll be watching for him to effectively cede NH and concentrate on SC. It would be better for Obama if Edwards stayed in until Super Tuesday, though.
4. The upper-midwest swing states (WI, MN, and OH) and turning-blue Mountain states (CO, NM, MT) will be toughest for Obama to win over and, yet, some must be won (WI, MN, and NM at the very least) for a Dem to win the White House. HRC will play stronger in these states, though not if she waits too long and Obama cinches the nomination beforehand. Toward this end, persuading Richardson to throw his support to Clinton and making a big thing about how HRC plays better in the Mountain states than Obama does (correction, did before IA last night) might be a next step for HRC. (Even half-baked, I doubt this cake warrants frosting.)
5. Everyone is wondering what rabbit HRC will pull out of the hat, given her drubbing last night in America's center and given how damaging starting a bitter-if-tonally-critical harangue toward Obama would be for her in most of the primaries to come, not to mention the GE. Never, never count the political genius of Bill Clinton out. Their strategists, image communicators, organizers, and managers have been supplanted by a younger, nimbler, and harder-working generation of pols. That is the way the world works: the new supplants the old. But, Bill Clinton will come up with something; he always does. I doubt HRC will be able to sell it or otherwise execute what Bill comes up with though. She certainly didn't in the center of America last night.
6. Finally, Obama delivered a stunning speech last night. With overtones of MLK and JFK, he outclassed Dem and GOP rivals by far. (Huckabee's, while devotational, rang incoherent in reality-based ears. And McCain's was tactical, which is seldom "presidential.") He is clearly the guy to beat for Dems and Reps alike now. If NH and SC follow IA's suit and unless the unexpected or unthinkable happens, none of them will lay a glove on him.
(I am working for none of the candidates, though I have been leaning toward Obama since his speech at our last Convention.)
· "The Conspiracy to Kill the New Deal" (desmoinesdem)
· Blanche Lincoln's website supports public option (desmoinesdem)
· Big Coal's PR Spending Spree (desmoinesdem)
· IA-03: Former college wrestling coach to challenge Boswell (desmoinesdem)
· Tea Baggers Target Gore... (Cliff Schecter)
· Stimulus Watch (Jerome Armstrong)
· CREW seeks ethics inquiry of Bachmann (desmoinesdem)
· Did IRC help? (MN Campaign Report)
· 5 Worst cities for urban youth (desmoinesdem)
· "The Bishops' Huge Financial Stake in Stupak-Pitts" (desmoinesdem)
· Conservative group wants FEC to override state laws on robocalls (desmoinesdem)
· URGENT: Call these House Ds Saturday to oppose Stupak amendment (desmoinesdem)